<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>02278nab a22003017a 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">049460</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CL-SaANEPE</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20211029001445.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="006">a||||| |||| 00| 0 </controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">130823n2013    xx ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">CL-SaANEPE</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">CL-SaANEPE</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">CL-SaANEPE</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Morgan, Kimberly</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="082" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">US.WP/1/2013</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Path shifting of the welfare state :</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">electoral competition and the expansion of work-family policies in western Europe.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Vol. 65, nro. 1 (january 2013), p. 73-115</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">What explains the surprising growth of work-family policies in several West European countries ? Much research on the welfare state emphasizes its institutional stickiness and immunity to major change. Yet, over the past two decades, governments in Germany, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom have introduced important reforms to their welfare regimes, enacting paid leave schemes, expanded rights to part-time work, and greater investments in child care. A comparison of these countries reveals a similar sequence of political and policy change. Faced with growing electoral inestability and the decline of core constituencies, party leaders sought to attact dealigning voter groups, such as women. This led them to introduce feminizing reforms of their party structures and adopt policies to support mothers' employment. In all three cases, women working within the parties played an important role in hatching or lobbying for these reforms. After comparing three countries that moved in a path-shifting direction, this article engages in a brief traveling exercise, examining whether a similar set of dynamics are lacking in two countries - Austria and Italy - that have moved more slowly in reforming these policies. Agaisnt the prevailing scholarly literature that emphasizes path dependence and slow-moving change, this article reveals the continued power of electoral politics in shaping redistributive policies</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">BIENESTAR SOCIAL</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">FAMILIA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">MUJERES</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">POLITICA LABORAL</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">POLITICAS SOCIALES</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">REINO UNIDO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">PAISES BAJOS</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">ALEMANIA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="t">World Politics.</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">020492</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">REVA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="945" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">oss20130823</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">49203</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">49203</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
