<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01998nab a22002777a 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">051646</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CL-SaANEPE</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20211029003009.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="006">a||||| |||| 00| 0 </controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">160317n2014    xx ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">CL-SaANEPE</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">CL-SaANEPE</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">CL-SaANEPE</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Sankaran, Jaganath</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="082" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">US.SS/4/2014</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Limits of the chinese antisatellite threat to the United States.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Vol. 8, nro. 4 (winter 2014), p. 19-46</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">The argument that US armed forces are critically dependent on satelites and therefore extremely vulnerable to disruption from chines antisatellite attacks is not rooted in evidence. It rests on untested assumptions - primarily, that China would find attacking US military satellites operationallity feasible and desirable. This article rejects those assumptions by critically examining the challenges involved in executing an ASAT attack versus the limited potential benefits such action would yield for China. While some US satellites are vulnerable, the limited reach of China's ballistic missiles and inadequate infrastructure make it infeasible for China to mount extensive ASAT operations necessary to substantially affect US capabilities. even if China could execute a very complex, difficult ASAT attacks, the United States must employ technical innovations including space situational awareness, shielding, avoidance, and redundancies. Any coherent plan to dissuade and deter China from employing an ASAT attack must also include negotiations ans arms control agreements. While it may not be politically possible to address all chinese concerns, engaging and addressing some of them is the sensible way to build a stable and cooperative regime in space</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">ASAT</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">DISUASION</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">FUERZAS ARMADAS</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">SATELITES</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">ESTADOS UNIDOS</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">CHINA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="t">Strategic Studies Quarterly.</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">020904</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">REVA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="945" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">OSS20160317</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">51388</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">51388</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
