01598naa a22002417a 450000100060000000300110000600500170001700600190003400800410005304000390009408200180013310000190015124500250017030000150019552009630021065000150117365000290118865000210121765100190123865100110125765100140126877300740128252675CL-SaANEPE20211029003835.0a||||| |||| 00| 0 930304t2015    xx ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d  aCL-SaANEPEcCL-SaANEPEdCL-SaANEPE  a327.973/C.486  aCragin, R. Kim13aCounterign terrorism  app.133-148  aThe United States faces an unprecedented threat from terrorism today: two transregional tenworks actively plot attacks, recruit foreign fighters, and seek to inspire lone wolf terrorists. But this threat in manageable. Rather than trying to defeat terrorist adversaries. U.S. strategy should emphasize reducing the risk of significant attacks in the homeland, western Europe, Canada, and Australia. In addition to homeland security measures, such a strategy would be characterized by a shif, and likely an increase, in the placement of U.S. special operations forces and intelligence assets overseas. Managing this threat would also require greater coordination with, and persistence from, other instruments of national power, including diplomacy and law enforcement. The key counterterrorism challenge for a new administartion, therefore, is how to develop and sustain a strategy that manges this threat persistently, without being on a constant war footing17aTERRORISMO17aTERRORISMO INTERNACIONAL17aCONTRATERRORISMO17aESTADOS UNIDOS17aCANADA17aAUSTRALIA0 tCharting a course : strategic choices for a new administrationw52617