<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01977nab a22002777a 4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">53896</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">53896</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="001">53896</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">CL-SaANEPE</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20211029004634.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="006">a||||| |||| 00| 0 </controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">160316t2018    xx ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">CL-SaANEPE</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">CL-SaANEPE</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">CL-SaANEPE</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="082" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">US.SS/3/2018</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Borghard, Erica D.</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">48022</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Confidence building measures for the cyber domain</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">12, 3 (fall 2018) :10-49</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">There is a growing debate among scholars and practitioners in the cyber conflict field regarding the extent to which the cyber domain is likely to be characterized by inadvertent escalatory spirals and arms races between increasingly cyber-capable states. Historically, technological innovation or geopolitical dynamics have propelled states to form confidence building measures (CBM) or create arms control regimes to institutionalize constraints on offensive military technology and guard against inadvertent conflict and escalation. We argue that cyber CBMs could blunt some of the factors that contribute to crises and escalation.Given the absence of arms control regimes for the cyber domain, cyber CBMs could be used to mitigate the risks to stability between states and possibly change the incentives that could lead to crises. In assessing current cyber confidence building initiatives, this article creates a novel framework to better understand these efforts. It also identifies limits of cyber CBMs and provides prescriptions for new steps in cyber CBMs to enhance mutual security and guard against inadvertent conflict stemmingfrom cyber erations. </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
    <subfield code="a">CIBERNETICA</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">28873</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
    <subfield code="a">GUERRA CIBERNETICA</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">35042</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
    <subfield code="a">CARRERA ARMAMENTISTA</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">28452</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
    <subfield code="a">MEDIDAS DE CONFIANZA MUTUA</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">37959</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7">
    <subfield code="a">TECNOLOGIA MILITAR</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">44296</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="9">48023</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Lonergan, Shawn W.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="t">Strategic Studies Quarterly.</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">020904</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">REVA</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="945" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">OSS20181001</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">BC</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">BC</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2018-10-01</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">US.SS/3/2018</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2018-10-01</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2018-10-01</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">REVA</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
