000			02102nab a22003137a 4500
001			050326
003			CL-SaANEPE
005			20211029002051.0
006			a||||| |||| 00| 0
008			140916n2014 xx ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_aCL-SaANEPE _cCL-SaANEPE _dCL-SaANEPE
100	1		_aBurgoon, Brian
082			_aUS.WP/3/2014
245	1	0	_aInmigration, integration, and support for redistribution in Europe.
300			_aVol. 66, nro. 3 (july 2014), p. 365-405
520			_aInmigration poses individual or collective economic risks that might increase citizen support for government redistribution, but i can also generate fiscal preasure or undermine social solidarity to diminish such support. These offsetting conditions obscure the net effects are mediated by the economic and social integration of inmigrants. Integration can be conceptualized and measured as involving the degree to which inmigrants, suffer unemployment rates, depend on welfare-state benefits, and harbor social attitudes similarly to the native population. Such integration may alter how immigration reduces solidarity and imposes fiscal and macroeconomic pressures, but does not much alter how immigration should have less negatives. Where migrants are more integrated by such measures, immigration should have less negative or more positive implications for native support for government redistribution and welfare states than where migrants are less integrated. The article explores these arguments using survey data for twentytwo european countries between 2002 and 2010. The principal finding is that economic: integration, more than sociocultural integration, softens the tendency of immigrations to undermine support for redistributive policies
590			_aBIBLIOTECA NOVEDADES 2014/6
650		4	_aDISTRIBUCION DEL INGRESO
650		4	_aECONOMIA
650		4	_aEMIGRACIONES
650		4	_aINMIGRACIONES
650		4	_aINTEGRACION
650		4	_aINTEGRACION SOCIAL
650		4	_aMIGRACIONES
651		4	_aEUROPA
773	0		_tWorld Politics. _w020492
942			_cREVA
945			_aoss20140916
999			_c50069 _d50069