000			01467nab a22002537a 4500
001			051634
003			CL-SaANEPE
005			20211029003005.0
006			a||||| |||| 00| 0
008			160317n2015 xx ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_aCL-SaANEPE _cCL-SaANEPE _dCL-SaANEPE
100	1		_aCohn, Lindsay P.
082			_aUS.SS/3/2015
245	1	0	_aHow much is enough?.
300			_aVol. 9, nro. 3 (fall 2015), p. 47-61
520			_aRecent debates in the United States have pitted the fiscal imperative of rationalizing the budget against the social narrative that society has an obligation to take care of its service members and veterans. This civil-military disconnect is a result of the structural necessity in so-called liberal market economies LME to focus significant portions of their military compensation on benefits, in addition to pay. These benefits - for example, helath care, childcare, education, and retirement - are not broadly provided to all citizens in LMEs and constitute attractive recruiting incentives. However, it is difficult to control their costs and difficult to limit or remove them once implemented. Thus, the United States is caught in a benefits trap with challenging civil-military and policy implications
650		4	_aBENEFICIOS
650		4	_aMILITARES
650		4	_aRELACIONES CIVICO MILITARES
651		4	_aESTADOS UNIDOS
773	0		_tStrategic Studies Quarterly. _w020904
942			_cREVA
945			_aOSS20160317
999			_c51376 _d51376